Yes, I did read all(past 3+ years) his replies specific to DMQ and DMQ USRLOC and only one matched exact description and there has no resolution to it. Github open+closed issues for DMQ didn't have anything similar either. Could it be something I'm doing wrong !?
Additional info: One of the server is direct on Public IP and Other one is behind NAT. Another test setup where it consistently reproducible is two server behind NAT(AWS) Here are the mod params. Only usrloc sync is done via DMQ and no other module is using DMQ.
listen=udp:LocalIP:5060 advertise PublicIP:5060
modparam("dmq","server_address", DMQ_LOCAL_SERVER) modparam("dmq", "notification_address", DMQ_REMOTE_SERVER) modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 0) //1 for DNS SRV modparam("dmq", "num_workers", 10) modparam("dmq", "ping_interval", 60)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1) modparam("dmq_usrloc", "sync", 1) modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_size", 4000) modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_usleep", 1000) modparam("dmq_usrloc", "usrloc_domain", "location")
Where: DMQ_REMOTE_SERVER = sip:PublicIP2:5060
GDB info as requested:
Core was generated by `/usr/local/sbin/kamailio -w /tmp/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f'. Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007f248c4cef15 in send_reply (msg=0x7f2469f88d40, code=0, reason=0x7ffd775e3ab8) at sl.c:276 276 if(reason->s[reason->len-1]=='\0') { (gdb) (gdb) (gdb) frame 0 #0 0x00007f248c4cef15 in send_reply (msg=0x7f2469f88d40, code=0, reason=0x7ffd775e3ab8) at sl.c:276 276 if(reason->s[reason->len-1]=='\0') { (gdb) p *reason $1 = {s = 0x0, len = 0} (gdb) (gdb) frame 1 #1 0x00007f24656c6549 in worker_loop (id=2) at worker.c:129 129 if(slb.freply(current_job->msg, peer_response.resp_code, (gdb) p *worker $3 = {queue = 0x7f2469f240a8, jobs_processed = 5, lock = {val = 2}, pid = 935} (gdb) (gdb) (gdb) p *current_job $6 = {f = 0x7f24656d6d8d <empty_peer_callback>, msg = 0x7f2469f88d40, orig_peer = 0x7f2469f6ed50, next = 0x0, prev = 0x0} (gdb)
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 1:30 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
have you tried the suggestion from Charles in the other response? It can help figuring out where the problem resides.
Now, from C point of view, I would need the following output from gdb of the core file:
frame 0 p *reason
frame 1 p *worker p *current_job
I would also need to know the modparams for dmq and other dmq_* module, plus the list if modules for which you enabled dmq (eg, htable, dialog, presence, ...).
Cheers, Daniel On 24.04.20 18:10, SamyGo wrote:
Oops,apologize, missed that:
version: kamailio 5.3.3 (x86_64/linux) 44ccb9-dirty flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 44ccb9 -dirty compiled on 17:04:55 Apr 17 2020 with gcc 4.9.2
Tried this with version 5.0, 5.2, and now 5.3 same situation..
Thankyou for looking into this, Sammy
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:33 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
you have to provide the version of kamailio for each reported kamailio issue, otherwise is hard to match with the source code. Use 'kamailio -v' to get version details.
Cheers, Daniel On 23.04.20 23:36, SamyGo wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to broadcast KDMQ to the cluster but not expect a reply back !?as far as I've read the source code dmq_bcast_message is exactly like dmq_send_message in a way that it expects a callback to be executed on response i.e expects a reply.
So, the situation I'm facing is I'm broadcasting message to cluster and I do not want a reply back. The following two options result in crash & core dump.
1 - If my script doesn't respond back, by use of dmq_handle_message, it marks the destined servers as "inactive" and stops usrloc sync process which isn't desirable. 2 - If I respond back with the dmq_handle_message it crashes the Kamailio which just received this broadcasted message.
Here is how its done in script:
*broadcasting message to cluster:* dmq_bcast_message("userOnline", "$fu", "text/plain");
*Receiving and handling a broadcast message:* route[DMQ_HANDLE] { if(!(is_method("KDMQ") || $rm == "KDMQ")) return;
if(is_method("KDMQ") || $rm == "KDMQ"){ if($rU =~ "userOnline"){ //user came online in cluster, resume transactionsif-any suspended $avp(remoteUser) = $rb; } dmq_handle_message(); exit; } }
*Related log lines:* Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: ALERT: <script>: [da2c1-2f499] ------ DMQ_HANDLE: UserOnline Event Received ------ Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: DEBUG: dmq [message.c:53]: ki_dmq_handle_message_rc(): dmq_handle_message [KDMQ sip:userOnline@9.8.7.123:5060] Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: DEBUG: dmq [message.c:66]: ki_dmq_handle_message_rc(): dmq_handle_message peer found: userOnline Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:437]: receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 401461 usec Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[935]: DEBUG: dmq [worker.c:87]: worker_loop(): dmq_worker [2 935] lock acquired and crash/segfault..
Core dump: https://pastebin.com/S7ekCPfF
Any help or pointers to solve this would be really appreciated.
Best Regards, Sammy
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda