Re: [SR-Users] B2BUA issues

The short answer to your latter question is: yes. Cisco media and PSTN gateways have never hairpinned SIP-to-SIP calls well, even when officially supported. Asterisk has a lower learning curve due to the abundance of information and tutorials, but SEMS would make more sense, since all you need is a signaling B2BUA. -- Alex -- Sent from my Samsung mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a proper keyboard. Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ phillman25 &lt;phillman25(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Hi Alex Thanks for your prompt reply. The PGW 2200 solution is used as our core PSTN gateway where its currently handling many SS7, H.323 and SIP interconnections. However, there are a few scenarios like the example described below, that the call is originating from Kamailio being sent to the PGW and then back to Kamailio for termination and this scenario doesn't seem to work. Do you think that by implementing SEMS or Asterisk in between the PGW and Kamailio could resolve this issue for these specific scenarios? From your experience what do you think would be a better solution? Thanks again! Phillip ======================== Message: 2 Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 04:26:28 -0400 From: Alex Balashov &lt;abalashov(a)evaristesys.com&gt; Subject: Re: [SR-Users] B2BUA issues To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Message-ID: &lt;501F7FB4.8040700(a)evaristesys.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed What is the larger objective? Are you using the PGW purely as a B2BUA? If so, that's a colossally overblown waste of resources; just use something like SEMS or Asterisk. On 08/06/2012 04:24 AM, phillman25 wrote: 66623da5>,<sip:22030305@ lr=on;ftag=as166b1eea>