8 Dec
2004
8 Dec
'04
4:55 p.m.
One more thing I forgot to mention. This ser.cfg requires the unstable CVS version of ser.
I'm
currently using -dev24
Regards,
Paul
--- Java Rockx <javarockx(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to include the link.
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-December/013683.html
Cheers,
Paul
--- Iqbal Gandham <iqbal(a)gigo.co.uk> wrote:
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Hi
Did I miss the attachment of the ser.cfg file :-)
Also when usingmediaproxy doesnt this route the media via ser, if so how
does this affect the laod that can be handled, I am using ser+asterisk
for this reason, just to let ser handle the proxy part, and the stream
to be done via asterisk.
tks
iqbal
Java Rockx wrote:
> MySTUN is at http://developer.berlios.de/projects/mystun/
> Vovida STUN is at http://sourceforge.net/projects/stun/
>
> Also, Thomas is is possible to complete avoid STUN altogether by using either of the
SER NAT
> traversal modules (aka, mediaproxy or nathelper). Both work very well. We're
using
mediaproxy
because
it provides very good tools for "peeking" in to the RTP proxy's activity.
Here is a complete ser.cfg I posted a few days ago which uses rtpproxy. SIP clients do
not
need to
use STUN with this configuration.
Regards,
Paul
--- support <support(a)cybertel.biz> wrote:
Hi Nils,
Which two open source STUN servers are available now? Thank you.
Thomas
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 06:44, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>STUN and FCP are two completely different approaches. STUN allows a UA to
>learn its public IP. With FCP the idea is that the proxy controls the
>NAT/firewall, so that the router becomes a SIP aware packet filter.
>
>But as FCP is not maintained any more your better option is for sure a STUN
>server (there are at least two open source server implementations available).
>
>Greetings
> Nils
>
>On Tuesday 07 December 2004 09:45, support wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Do you mean that I need to use a third-party software for STUN?
>>
>>Thomas
>>
>>On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 16:15, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>>
>>>FCP is not being maintained. -jiri
>>>
>>>At 08:41 AM 12/7/2004, support wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I have downloaded and installed the fcp server. Is FCP server the same
>>>>as STUN server. Moreever, I don't know how to use it with SER server.
>>>>Can someone tells me how to configure it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thomas
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>--
>>>Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.