19 Dec
2013
19 Dec
'13
2:57 a.m.
Can you share here the parameters you set for tm module?
Daniel
On 19/12/13 01:55, Kelvin Chua wrote:
Also noticed $ru pegged at the first branch's ruri upon entering
failure_route for succeeding branches. Is this also an expected
behaviour? Should it not contain the ruri of the previous failed branch?
On Dec 18, 2013 4:19 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
I will look over it -- I wanted to know exactly the situation.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17/12/13 15:54, Kelvin Chua wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Yes, a local timeout. The call was sent to a bogus IP. i still
feel this behaviour is wrong. $rd in acc should contain the
failed gateway's ip and not the previous one.
On Dec 17, 2013 4:43 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla"
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
It is a local timeout, not a 408 received from callee, right?
Daniel
On 17/12/13 05:16, Kelvin Chua wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
it's for a 408 timeout logged into
missed_calls
Kelvin Chua
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
is it for a 200ok reply or >=300?
In the code, the r-uri from the branch that is used for
relaying the reply should be used.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/12/13 12:15, Kelvin Chua wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
this is the 2nd branch, the first
branch is sent to
100.200.30.40
$rd is set properly according to xlog (10.20.30.40).
tcpdump proves packets are sent to 10.20.30.40
however, after failing, ACC logs dst_domain as the
previous branch's $rd (100.200.30.40), not the current one.
is this the expected behavior? seems incorrect.
modparam("acc",
"db_extra","src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;src_ip=$si;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd;callrate=$avp(callrate)")
failure_route[SERIAL] {
if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) {
t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH");
t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY");
}
if ( isbflagset(FLB_CANCEL) ) {
xlog("cancel bflag set!\n");
exit;
} else if ( !t_next_contacts() ) {
xlog("serial fork done!\n");
t_reply("404", "Not here or busy");
exit;
} else {
setflag(FLT_ACC);
setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED);
xlog("failure_route new branch - $ru\n");
t_on_failure("SERIAL");
$avp(callrate) = "";
if ( $sel(ruri.params["rtmr"]) != $null ) {
t_set_fr($sel(ruri.params["rtmr"])*1000,$sel(ruri.params["dtmr"])*1000);
$avp(ABSOLUTE) = $sel(ruri.params["tmr"]);
}
if ( $sel(ruri.params["callrate"]) !=
$null )
$avp(callrate) = $sel(ruri.params["callrate"]);
xlog("failure_route sending INVITE to $rd\n");
t_relay();
}
}
ERROR: <script>: failure_route sending INVITE to
10.20.30.40
DEBUG: <script>: new branch [1] to
sip:14X88X72X2X@10.20.30.40:5060;dtmr=1;rtmr=20;tmr=60;callrate=0.007600000000
DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag
DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy_funcs.c:148]:
check_content_type(): type <application/sdp> found valid
DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:565]:
extract_mediaip(): located IP address [192.168.5.191]
in `o=' field
DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:565]:
extract_mediaip(): located IP address [192.168.5.191]
in `c=' field
DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy.c:2630]: force_rtp_proxy():
proxy reply: 10370 2X8.1X1.3X.2X#012
DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag
DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:461]: clen_builder():
clen_builder: content-length: 172 (172)
DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]:
check_via_address(): check_via_address(1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0,
192.168.5.191, 0)
DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:793]: free_sdp(): _sdp
= 0x7f53c9a5e580
DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:795]: free_sdp(): sdp =
0x7f53cb87d3e0
DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:797]: free_sdp():
session = 0x7f53cb87d480
DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1710]: relay_reply(): DEBUG:
relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=-1
DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1211]: t_should_relay_response():
->>>>>>>>> T_code=100, new_code=408
DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]:
run_trans_callbacks_internal(): DBG:
trans=0x7f53c1511148, callback type 128, id 0 entered
DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:539]: tmcb_func(): acc callback
called for t(0x7f53c1511148) event type 128, reply code 408
NOTICE: acc [acc.c:279]: acc_log_request(): ACC: call
missed:
timestamp=1387019197;method=INVITE;from_tag=wyudf;to_tag=;call_id=cjfbdfydrjielti@X340saucy;code=408;reason=RequestTimeout;src_user=kelvin;src_domain=2X8.1X1.3X.2X;src_ip=1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0;dst_ouser=14X88X72X2X;dst_user=14X88X72X2X;dst_domain=100.200.30.40;callrate=0.007600000000
<mailto:timestamp=1387019197;method=INVITE;from_tag=wyudf;to_tag=;call_id=cjfbdfydrjielti@X340saucy;code=408;reason=RequestTimeout;src_user=kelvin;src_domain=2X8.1X1.3X.2X;src_ip=1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0;dst_ouser=14X88X72X2X;dst_user=14X88X72X2X;dst_domain=100.200.30.40;callrate=0.007600000000>
Kelvin Chua
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users