30 Apr
2007
30 Apr
'07
2:38 p.m.
Hello Klaus,
On 04/30/07 13:55, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
It might be that it took so long
to write the mem long at shut down and
openser killed itself. If it was not due to a openser stop, then I am
not aware of any case when signal 9 is sent unless issued by user.
Cheers,
Daniel
Hello Klaus,
On 04/27/07 09:27, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Should solve the memory-leak - but the signal 9? Hi Daniel!
I've tried with t_release and it was running fine several hours
without leaking. But then, unfortunately openser terminated with
signal 9. I've never seen this before.
signal 9 is KILL, it is very strange if it was not issued by a user
or other process.
We discovered the issue (tm/uac.c, line 224), ther eis flag that is
kept to see if there was some operation with the transaction, but in
case of handle_publish() that flag is set by TM api when sending
NOTIFY. The patch is trivial, removing a line, but we have to
investigate if there are some other effects -- so it may take a
while. t_release() should solve meanwhile.
regards
klaus