RE: [Serusers] forward() and t_relay() differences

Thanks, I already read that. What I was concerned about was more of if they modified the SIP message differently before being sent. For example I have a layer 4 switch in front of 2 SER servers which runs a virtual IP of 198.88.216.84. The real servers ser0 and ser1 have IP's of 198.88.216.87 and 198.88.216.89 respectively. The problem I am having is that when I run 2 SER seems to get confused when a gateway starts talking to ser0 while a client is talking to ser1. Since the layer 4 switch is doing reverse NAT so all traffic coming from the 2 ser servers appears as 198.88.216.84 this causes a problem when they stick themselves in the Via line as their real IP and not as 198.88.216.84. Is there a way to override that? Is t_relay() what is causing the weirdness? By using forward(uri:host, uri:port) inplace of t_relay() will it break anything (I am not checking the status of t_relay() on return)? ---------------------------------------- Michael Shuler, C.E.O. BitWise Communications, Inc. (CLEC) And BitWise Systems, Inc. (ISP) 682 High Point Lane East Peoria, IL 61611 Office: (217) 585-0357 Cell: (309) 657-6365 Fax: (309) 213-3500 E-Mail: mike(a)bwsys.net Customer Service: (877) 976-0711