Re: [Users] Problem with ACK's (branch=0)

I was one of the initial reporters of this "bug" In my case the issue was the use of Strict routing in the ACK or BYE message that somehow wasn't caught by the "loose_route()" statement. The UAC sends the messages with a URI of the SER proxy. I didn't get a very good reception to my request, i the feeling i got was that it was passed off an as not important or uninteresting. In my case i resolved the issue by upgrading the UAC that was sending the ACK/BYE. I've seen at least 5-6 people report this, with the varying responses (mostly that there was no issue, when it looked to me that there was). I hope someone who understands the necessary specifications and also SER would look into this and quash the issue once and for all (even if just to diffinitively identify it) I would be interested in spending some time to try and get to the bottom of the issue, i will dig up the data from previous emails this afternoon and see if i can assist. Rodrigo P. Telles wrote: Bogdan, Fistrly, thanks for your answer! Reading some old posts about 'branch=0' I found some one saying that it happend because SER forward statelessly, but I'm using "t_relay()" and I suppose it's a statefull function, does'n it? I saw this question many times in serusers maillist but no one answer it! According with RFC3261 'branch=0' is not a valid branch ID (I know I can use syn_branch=0)! Best regards. -- ============================================ Rodrigo P. Telles <telles(a)devel.it> Diretor de Tecnologia Devel-IT - http://www.devel.it ============================================ Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

> >

_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users