21 Jun
2005
21 Jun
'05
11:30 p.m.
You could definitely query the current bindings with sipsak, check the q value
in some script language and the re-insert the binding with the fixed q value
(if required). But that really sounds cumbersome to me...
Nils
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 23:00, Aisling O'Driscoll wrote:
Ok, just to recap - cos Im getting a little bit
confused ;)
I have two choices(?)
1. Somehow invoke sipsak to configure permanent addresses with a
particular q value.
2. Develop a FIFO method to change q value.
Am I correct in thinking directly modifying the usrloc table in the
database is out of the question because the changes cant be updated
except by SER itself in which case a reboot would required - Correct?
Also lcr module (load_contacts() etc) isnt suitable for per user
configurable sequential forking?
Have others tried to implement similar functionality or is it usually
a generic site wide sequential forking policy?
Many thanks for the opinions and help so far.
Aisling.
---- Original Message ----
From: jh(a)tutpro.com
To: greger(a)teigre.com
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Portal for forking call to
preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:41:54 +0300
check
-------------------Legal Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only
for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by
legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error
please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any
unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited.
The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information
electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained
in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as
transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Greger V. Teigre writes:
> :-D Yes, that is true. But I didn't know that you could change
q-value in
FIFO?
if that is not possible, then you can always use sipsak to install
"permanent" registrations with a given q value. sipsak has an
additional advantage over fifo in that you can apply permissions to sipsak registration, but not to fifo
registration.
-- juha
-------------------Legal
Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is
confidential and intended
only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
sender nor for any delay in its receipt.