Yes, they are identical in every way except for the .1 and .2 branch IDs.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I don't recall any change in this aspect, are the two branches going to
same destination?
Cheers, Daniel
On 5/13/13 2:43 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Hello,
Has something changed about default forking behaviour in >= 4.0?
I have a scenario where INVITEs processed by the proxy first hit a redirect server, catch a 302, and then append another branch and iterate over one or more outbound routes.
In the past, this worked fine. After I upgraded to 4.0, I am seeing two branches at a time on the outbound routes, after the initial branch to the redirect server. The desired behaviour is serial forking at all times.
tm:failure_reply_mode is set to 3, as it always has been.
Any ideas would be appreciated; thank you!
-- Alex
-- Sent from my mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a fully fledged keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com