11 Dec
2006
11 Dec
'06
2:24 p.m.
O'Shaughnessy Evans wrote:
Hello. I'm trying to debug a problem I seem to be
having with parallel
forking and I'd like to check my understanding of ser's behavior on a
few points.
I have 2 phone numbers registered in the location table for a certain
subscriber, each with a q value of 1. When I call the subscriber number,
I don't see ser forking and then sending an INVITE to each contact, but
only the one with the lower expiration value (the first number that
"serctl ul show" lists). I have append_branches set to 1 and
desc_time_order set to 0.
That is correct. Parallel forking is the default behavior even if you
do not set these parameters.
The way I've understood everything I've read,
lookup() should be laying
the groundwork for the tm module to fork ser so that when I call t_relay
ser will intiate one INVITE to each location with the same q value. Is
this not correct? Is there anything special I should be doing to tell
it to fork an INVITE to each contact at this point?
Yes, that is correct.
Jan.