8 Nov
2020
8 Nov
'20
1:06 p.m.
It doesn’t make much sense to me.
On local installations (on-premise) I have 1 HAProxy and multiple kamailio servers.
On AWS I have multiple kamailio servers behind ELB.
On 8 Nov 2020, 19:45 +0200, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov(a)gmail.com>om>, wrote:
you can try place haproxy + NAT on your own Linux
router.
In this case inbound connections with be delivered via HAproxy.
Outbound connections will be NAT-ed on the same host, to the same IP.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 6:31 PM Joey Golan
<joeygo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a kamailio server running behind HAProxy with proxy protocol v2 enabled.
> In Kamailio I have set the parameter tcp_accept_haproxy=yes and loaded tcpops
module.
> UEs are registered using TLS and kamailio sees that the message has received from
their real ip address + port and not HAProxy ip + port.
> When UE A calls UE B, kamailio is trying to reach UE B using his real ip address and
port instead of HAProxy IP address + port.
>
> I know I can get the tcp ip and port of HAProxy using $tcp(c_si) and $tcp(c_sp) but
I can’t make it work.
> What is the right way to do this? How should I use these variables properly in order
to establish the call successfully?
>
> Thanks,
> Joey.
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users