Re: [OpenSER-Users] "noisy_ctimer" parameter in TM module

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan@voice-system.ro wrote:

Hi guys,

Thanks a lot for the valuable input. In my opinion,trying to summarize the discussion:

what we need is not to have a mechanism to ignore the C timer, but rather a better way to manage/control C timer.

This means:

1. dropping (after all) the "noisy_ctimer" as it proves to be more or

less a hack

I'm all for it.

2. add new feature to manage/control C timer (like onreply route change

support, different routes for timeout and failures, etc)..

I would like to leave onreply route as is and deal with timeouts in a timeout_route. It will keep things structured and organized. If I need to check something about a timer, it will be in a single place, not spread around my config (just my 2c).

Is this commonly agreed?

It looks like.

Regards, Ovidiu Sas