[removed sems, semsdev, and serdev from cc]
I have updated the project page with:
- all the suggestions for what we have to install
- team members
Wow, Great, Seems the balling is rolling forward and
there is great
feedback from every one.
1. Just want to confirm that I am in.
2. I would also vote for CentOS and vmware.
3. How about sipp, which can be a good performance testing tool.
4. I hope we will be using latest release (or at least 2nst last
stable release) of kernel, mysql, apache, php, perl etc. The reason I
mentioned this is that, serweb had issues with Apache 2.x and php 5.x.
Cheers,
-Jai
On Dec 9, 2007 8:23 PM, ram <talk2ram(a)gmail.com
<mailto:talk2ram@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007 6:30 PM, SIP <sip(a)arcdiv.com
<mailto:sip@arcdiv.com>> wrote:
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
Hi guys, thanks a bunch for lots of input and I
really
appreciate the
willingness to contribute.
Thus, I have created a "project page":
http://www.iptel.org/sip_express_bundle_sip_service_in_15_minutes
I thought we could gather the current perspective on that
page and
document our decisions as we go. It will
hopefully be useful
in our
process, as well as documentation for us and
others later.
I have noted the following volunteers:
Jai: testing and installation work
ram: testing
yes iam there.
SIP: tesing
Jiri: anyting?
Mike: testing and documentation
Maybe we should set up a small mailing list for coordination
emails,
but for now, let's use serusers (where I
think all the
comments came).
(I copy the other lists on this post, so the
other lists
know that the
discussion will move to serusers).
Out of the comments, I read CentOS and vmware as the most wanted
combination. I have documented the pros and cons on the
project page,
and suggest that we do some testing before we
decide. I also
tried out
rpath (which I have no previous experience with).
My
observations are
documented on the same page.
Thus, I have started setting up a minimal CentOS virtual
appliance
found in vmware's appliance directory on an
esx server. I
will send
details on accessing it to the volunteers once it
is up and
running
(decompressing, unpacking, and building a
non-split disk
takes an
awful lot of time :-( ).
CENTOS will be good idea.
Ok, further comments, ideas, etc, please post to
serusers or
edit/add
comments to the project page (requires an
iptel.org <http://iptel.org/> account). I see
the following steps with documentation as we go
(steps also
found on
the project page):
1. Testing and specification of what we want to accomplish
2. Environment and OS setup to ensure that we easily can
release new
versions
3. Installation and configuration of the software. I assume
this step
also will involve development of some tools we
need, as well as
adaptation of existing stuff
4. Testing and user documentation
5. Packaging and deployment
Something I noted about the project. While I am all for a
virtual image
for testing purposes and getting things up and running while we're
creating this project, I think the ultimate goal should be
something
like an ISO that's ready to go on a server. There are many of
us in the
systems world who have not bought into the whole virtualisation
marketing gimmick when it comes to system deployment, and for
the casual
home user who's less comfortable with using VMs for an actual
production
system (which is, to be honest, a lot of people), it might be
easier in
the long term to get everything the way we want it and then
make an ISO
that's ready to drop onto whatever machine with all the
components we need.
BUT... first things first. :) We need a list of everything
that's going
to be in this bundle.
yes , we need to look at common man and make this installation process
and to be menu driven, while installation going on.
My assumptions are (at the basic level):
-SER 2.0 (in whatever state it's in atm)
-SERWeb
-RTPProxy
-SEMS
we need to look at Media proxy also as a base, since it has some
monitoring tools.
Secondary (but no less important) items that are a must-have:
-MySQL (I'm voting for 5 series here, but that will require my
patch for
the mysql code in SER 2.0)
-Apache (req'd for SERweb)
-SIPsak
-ngrep (invaluable for debugging as well as learning)
yes all the tools needed
Optional:
-mediaproxy
-freeradius
-radiusclient (for those who want to mesh SER with an existing
radius
infrastructure perhaps)
yes for the accurate billing we need to consider Radius
Thoughts?
we also need to look at modular solution.
and documentation for the same.
Like each service in one server.
ram
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers