2 Jul
2004
2 Jul
'04
6:59 p.m.
From what you describe there is little or no problems related to NAT
transversal but rather with the basic SER signaling setup. I would
suggest if I may to try spending more time and get experienced with how
SER works or get some consultant on board.
Adrian
On Jul 2, 2004, at 6:54 PM, Tjapko ITS Consult@ncy wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for answering. We use the mediaproxy module from unstable
version from last cvs and use SER version 0.8.12 from cvs on freeBSD
5.1.
We did exactly like the readme for the new mediaproxy says to install
the last version correctly. It is working fine but we have 2 problems:
1. When using the mediaproxy ser.cfg example file it will start ok
but right after call setup the ser will go into an indefinite loop.
2. When using a somewhat more developed ser.cfg we have some
problems: ser receive ACK from calling endpoint but it will not
forward it to called endpoint, so called endpoint will not open RTCP
streams for audio. It looks like ACK is losts somewhere on ser. This
happens not always but under certain conditions.
Both might be errors in our ser.cfg but we seem to overlook it. We
spent 2 weeks into this problem now and appreciate any further
comments that can lead to a solution. Any working example for ser with
mediaproxy will do.
We can sent you the other ser.cfg, dumps whatever if you like to take
a look at it.
Kindest regards, Tjapko.
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]On
Behalf Of Adrian Georgescu
Sent: Viernes, 02 de Julio de 2004 12:26 p.m.
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Ser and new Mediaproxy
Tjapko ,
There is no syntax change for ser.cfg in the latest version of
MediaProxy.
Adrian
----
Hello ,
Can someone provide me full working ser.cfg example for latest version
of Mediaproxy (example distributed with new mediaproxy does not seem to
work properly). Herunder you will find the test.cfg that we use.
Regards, Tjapko.