Hello,
We do not access to the P-asserted-identity in our configuration but we added the field PAI in the db base ACC ( for INVITE, ACK and BYE) . I dont know if it's in request_route, failure_route or branch_route .
This is the print :
(gdb) p mem_block $3 = (struct qm_block *) 0x7f6a6bef1010 (gdb) p shm_block $4 = (struct qm_block *) 0x7f6a5666a000
Regards,
Igor
2014-06-11 18:02 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com:
Hello,
cloning to shm for tm seems ok. Can you tell where you access P-Asserted-Identity header, via variables? Does it happen in request_route, failure_route or branch_route?
Can you print from gdb, any frame:
p mem_block p shm_block
I want to see if parsed filed point to shm or pkg memory.
Cheers, Daniel
On 11/06/14 17:37, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
at least I narrowed it down a bit. It is empty also in the clone stored in transaction, so it happens either during cloning or before. I will have to check these parts.
Cheers, Daniel
On 11/06/14 17:00, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello,
This is the result, always for frame 5 :
(gdb) p *t->uas.request->pai $1 = {type = HDR_PAI_T, name = { s = 0x7f6a60cd34b8 "P-Asserted-Identity: "0987654321" sip:0987654321@A.B.C.D\r\nContact: sip:0987654321@A.B.C.D:5060\r\nAllow: INVITE, BYE, REGISTER, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER, UPD"..., len = 19}, body = { s = 0x7f6a60cd34cd ""0987654321"sip:0987654321@A.B.C.D\r\nContact: sip:0987654321@A.B.C.D:5060\r\nAllow: INVITE, BYE, REGISTER, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER, UPDATE\r\nSupported: path,"..., len = 43}, len = 66, parsed = 0x7f6a6d81da88, next = 0x7f6a60cd3f10}
(gdb) p *((p_id_body_t*)(t->uas.request->pai->parsed)) $2 = {id = 0x0, num_ids = 0, next = 0x0}
*Did *you find one thing in common between the 2 occurrences? Do you have any ideas about what is the cause of this pai reset?
Regards,
Igor
2014-06-11 16:09 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com:
Hello,
in the same frame 5, can yo get:
p *t->uas.request->pai p *((p_id_body_t*)(t->uas.request->pai->parsed))
Cheers, Daniel
On 10/06/14 18:35, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
Hello,
Here is the results :
(gdb) frame 5 #5 0x00007f6a687e9b43 in acc_onreply (t=0x7f6a60d16ff8, req=0x7f6a60cd2c10, reply=0x7f6a6c119aa8, code=200) at acc_logic.c:471 471 acc_db_request(req);
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda