18 Jan
2011
18 Jan
'11
11:32 a.m.
Hello,
do you have an alias to server IP address only? If yes, then all ports
will be matched locally and r-uri will be consumed as strict route.
If not, can you run with high debug mode and send the output of ack
routing here?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 1/17/11 9:39 PM, Ricardo Martinez wrote:
Hello.
I was wondering if someone can help me with some problem that I’m
having with the combination of FreeSwitch and Kamailio as SBC.
I’m having and ACK not routed by kamailio and dropped.
Here is the debug.
100.100.100.211:5060 <http://100.100.100.211:5060> : Kamailio
100.100.100.211:5090 <http://100.100.100.211:5090> : FreeSwitch
100.100.100.108 : Caller
100.100.100.212 : Calle
Request-Line: INVITE sip:02131234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A02131234@100.100.100.211> SIP/2.0
Method: INVITE
[Resent Packet: False]
Message Header
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
64.76.148.108:42772;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-da0b2e4b1b5d0843-1---d8754z-;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
Contact: <sip:1234@64.76.148.108:42772
<http://sip:1234@64.76.148.108:42772>>
To: <sip:02131234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A02131234@100.100.100.211>>
From: "camila"<sip:1234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A1234@100.100.100.211>>;tag=8422566b
Call-ID: MjY2NDY5NTE3OTk4MzdmMjE0YWQxNWQ4MWFmY2JhMWQ.
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY,
MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO
Content-Type: application/sdp
User-Agent: Bria release 2.2 stamp 45414
Content-Length: 388
Message Body
Session Description Protocol
Status-Line: SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us
Status-Code: 100
[Resent Packet: False]
Message Header
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
64.76.148.108:42772;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-da0b2e4b1b5d0843-1---d8754z-;rport=42772
To: <sip:02131234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A02131234@100.100.100.211>>
From: "camila"<sip:1234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A1234@100.100.100.211>>;tag=8422566b
Call-ID: MjY2NDY5NTE3OTk4MzdmMjE0YWQxNWQ4MWFmY2JhMWQ.
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Server: kamailio (3.1.1 (i386/linux))
Content-Length: 0
Status-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK
Status-Code: 200
[Resent Packet: False]
Message Header
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
64.76.148.108:42772;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-da0b2e4b1b5d0843-1---d8754z-;rport=42772
Record-Route: <sip:100.100.100.211;lr=on>
From: "camila" <sip:1234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A1234@100.100.100.211>>;tag=8422566b
To: <sip:02131234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A02131234@100.100.100.211>>;tag=pBZjZayFUeDSp
Call-ID: MjY2NDY5NTE3OTk4MzdmMjE0YWQxNWQ4MWFmY2JhMWQ.
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: <sip:02131234@100.100.100.211:5090;transport=udp>
User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-d41e649
2011-01-11 12-25-55 -0600
Accept: application/sdp
Message Body
Session Description Protocol
Request-Line: ACK sip:02131234@100.100.100.211:5090;transport=udp
SIP/2.0
Method: ACK
[Resent Packet: False]
Message Header
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
64.76.148.108:42772;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-182d537bcb534165-1---d8754z-;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
Route: <sip:100.100.100.211;lr>
Contact: <sip:1234@64.76.148.108:42772
<http://sip:1234@64.76.148.108:42772>>
To: <sip:02131234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A02131234@100.100.100.211>>;tag=pBZjZayFUeDSp
From: "camila"<sip:1234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A1234@100.100.100.211>>;tag=8422566b
Call-ID: MjY2NDY5NTE3OTk4MzdmMjE0YWQxNWQ4MWFmY2JhMWQ.
CSeq: 1 ACK
User-Agent: Bria release 2.2 stamp 45414
Content-Length: 0
Status-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK
Status-Code: 200
[Resent Packet: True]
[Suspected resend of frame: 7]
Message Header
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
64.76.148.108:42772;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-da0b2e4b1b5d0843-1---d8754z-;rport=42772
Record-Route: <sip:100.100.100.211;lr=on>
From: "camila" <sip:1234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A1234@100.100.100.211>>;tag=8422566b
To: <sip:02131234@100.100.100.211
<mailto:sip%3A02131234@100.100.100.211>>;tag=pBZjZayFUeDSp
Call-ID: MjY2NDY5NTE3OTk4MzdmMjE0YWQxNWQ4MWFmY2JhMWQ.
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: <sip:02131234@100.100.100.211:5090;transport=udp>
User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.0.head-git-d41e649
2011-01-11 12-25-55 -0600
Accept: application/sdp
Message Body
Session Description Protocol
When I removed Freeswitch from the path the ACK is routed ok.
The ACK is routed by loose_route, but then it fails because the
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
What could be happening?
Regards,
Ricardo.-
*Ricardo Martínez **|* Ingeniero de Desarrollo
RedVoiss *|*rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net <mailto:rmartinez@redvoiss.net>
Santiago- Chile *|*+56 2 2408196
www.redvoiss.net <http://www.redvoiss.net>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
http://www.asipto.com