Hello Valentin. Thanks for your answer. So, according to your comment the correct format should be something like this ? : Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060;branch=z9hG4bK-aef982198ef98a981 , SIP/2.0/UDP 69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
????? Thanks again! Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
-----Mensaje original----- De: Valentin Nechayev [mailto:netch@portaone.com] Enviado el: martes, 29 de agosto de 2006 1:28 Para: Ricardo Martinez CC: serusers@iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Via Format?
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 17:13:17, rmartinez wrote about "[Serusers] Via Format?":
Hello list. Sorry to ask this question here, but i can't find the answer in the RFC3261
Is this "VIA" permited according to the RFC?
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.20.6.205:15060, SIP/2.0/UDP 69.1.229.69:4081;branch=z9hG4bK-58e9ccfcef0f4c99915b8007cb9713e1-1156793814
Yes, multiple values can be grouped in one header, but the first Via value lacks branch; it's real violation of RFC3261. (Seems it is allowed by RFC2543, but 2543 is rather obsoleted)
It seems to be two VIA's in ONE line...