26 Aug
2005
26 Aug
'05
7:14 p.m.
Carlo wrote:
maybe you are right but I can see that FWD is using
Jasomi SBC to solve
nat problems.
There are also other SIP provider than FWD ;-)
klaus
http://lite.fwdnet.net/index.php?section_id=78
Carlo
Jiri Kuthan ha scritto:
beg my pardon, but I don't really think that
one needs a session border control, particularly
becasue of the reasons related to bad scalability, bandwidth waste and latency. Sinle
point
of failure is another concern.
-jiri
At 02:20 PM 8/26/2005, Carlo wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers What you need is a session border control.
Try this link from Jasomi : http://www.jasomi.com/ppfes.html
or this from Kagoor ( now Juniper )
http://www.juniper.net/customers/support/products/vf1000.jsp
Federico Giannici ha scritto:
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Considering that we DON'T want to use an RTP
Proxy (bad scalability, waste of bandwidth and longer delays), is there any solution to
the "hairpin" problems?
Are there any "boxes" that look at the SIP messages and short-circuit calls from
and to the local network?
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers