24 Jan
2007
24 Jan
'07
10:17 a.m.
Salut Ion,
you do not need the siproxd at all- just use openser as a middle server.
regards,
bogdan
Ion Minzu wrote:
Salut Bogdan-Andrei,
Wednesday, January 24, 2007, 11:52:41 AM, you wrote:
Siproxd can't be use for my scheme, just between the users and
openser. I realized it just now.
I explain why:
- in my case siproxd waits from the openser the message REGISTER, but
this message doesn't come. Normally comes just the message INVITE,
that's why siproxd replies 408 Request Time Out.
Debug from siproxd:
-INFO:proxy.c:159 Outgoing Call: 12345(a)domain.com -> 678910(a)domain.com
-proxy.c:272 request [INVITE] from/to unregistered UA (RQ: 12345(a)domain.com ->
678910(a)domain.com)
P.S. Maybe isn't the case to write it here, but I think it will be useful.
I have lost 1 day playing with the siproxd.
Trying to do it using mediaproxy :)))
Salut Ion,
to be honest I never tried this, but theoretical
it should work if you
configure the transit proxy with two interfaces and use either the
mhomed core param, either force_send_socket() to control the interface
selection.
from media point of view, I know rtpproxy support
bridging mode, but I
do not know about mediaproxy.
regards,
bogdan
Ion Minzu wrote:
>Hello ,
>
> Hello,
>
> I have the following situation:
>
> UA's ----> openser ----> proxy ------> international
> 172.19.5.0/24 172.19.5.2 172.19.5.3 traffic
> A.B.C.D E.F.G.H
>
>The problem is about proxy, I need a proxy which would be function as
>transit between openser (private IP) and a router with a public IP
>(it should pass the NAT too).
>I have tested siproxd(http://siproxd.sourceforge.net/) for the case
>when it sits between the openser (public IP) and the users with
>private IP - and it works.
>In the first case siproxd doesn't want to work ( neither as a
>transparent sip proxy), openser sends INVITE to proxy, it replies 408
>Request Time Out.
>
>The question is: can RTPproxy or mediaproxy help me in this case? Or
>maybe there is another solution to solve my problem?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>