27 Apr
2016
27 Apr
'16
7:50 p.m.
Hello,
dlg_bridge is not using the location table at all, because it has to use
the contact from 200ok of INVITE.
Have you used set_contact_alias() for natted 200ok received for INVITE?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/04/16 11:15, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
Hello Daniel
This is the sample output from our location table;
kamailio=# select username,contact,received,user_agent from location
where username='5678*0012';
username | contact | received |
user_agent
-----------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+---------------------
5678*0012 | sip:5678*0012@192.168.1.21:5090
<http://0012@192.168.1.21:5090> | sip:DEVICE_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090 |
Cisco/SPA504G-7.6.1
(1 row)
After calling dlg_bridge Kamailio firing INVITE and rings the device.
After answering on this device Kamailio firing REFER message.
But as you can see from ngrep output below, Kamailio is trying to send
this message to address in the contact field which is a private IP.
U 2016/04/27 10:58:25.745935 KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090 ->
192.168.1.21:5090 <http://192.168.1.21:5090>
REFER sip:5678*0012@192.168.1.21:5090 <http://0012@192.168.1.21:5090>
SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090;branch=z9hG4bK0ab8.1c5e622e4af6b7b6c9ede7ade4a50bf8.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK0ab8.c8a54413000000000000000000000000.0.
To: <sip:5678*0012@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS>;tag=199aaa02310a0799i1.
From:
<sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS>;tag=0d71401ca91009b00be5953e2813d7e4-7471.
CSeq: 11 REFER.
Call-ID: 63dc8c8a5ea88a30-868@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Max-Forwards: 69.
Content-Length: 0.
User-Agent: Kamailio.
Referred-By: sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Refer-To: sip:5678*0002@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Contact: <sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5060>.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
can you send the ngrep trace for such case? I would like to look
at the headers to understand properly what do you mean.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26/04/16 15:23, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Hello
I am trying to implement click 2 call functionality on Kamailio
with dlg_bridge.
But It seems that Kamailio routes REFER messages to devices
according to Contact field of location table instead of Received
field.
But if the the IP in the Contact field is private REFER messages
are failing so
does the dlg_bridge.
I called dlg_bridge in the config like this:
dlg_bridge("sip:$param1", "sip:$param2",
"sip:IP_ADDRESS_OF_KAMAILIO:5060");
It rings the device in $param1 but after answering on that device
Kamailio fails to send REFER if the Contact field for that device
is Private IP.
So it fails to initiate a call.
How can I force Kamailio to use Received field for REFER messages
instead of Contact field?
Thanks
Huseyin
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users