append_branch will add a new branch. But the t_relay in failure route only uses the new branch, as the previous branch is alreaddy terminated.
klaus
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Klaus,
But, doesn't append_branch cause parallel forking? I don't want parallel forking. If I do parallel forking, the same registration may get delivered to the same Asterisk box twice, and that's not what I want.
Doug.
-----Original Message----- From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:01 AM To: Douglas Garstang Cc: users@openser.org Subject: Re: [Users] More Routing....
Where's the problem? in route[1] or in the failure route?
You need append branch in failure route
klaus
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Can someone please tell me why the following extremely simple example doesn't first attempt to relay to 192.168.10.7, and then if that fails, try 192.168.10.8? What am I missing here? The documentation says that t_relay() simple sends statefully to the current URI.... seems to be what I am doing. What am I missing? Please help!
route(1);
route[1] { rewritehostport("192.168.10.7:5060"); t_on_failure("2"); t_relay(); }
failure_route[2] { rewritehostport('192.168.10.8:5060"); t_relay(); }
Doug.
Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users