El Friday 14 September 2007 13:17:09 Klaus Darilion escribió:
Juha Heinanen schrieb:
Klaus Darilion writes:
Are you sure? I think INVITE sip:klaus@iptel.org SIP/2.0 Route: sip:iptel.org;lr
that kind of route header uri does not provide any added value to request uri.
You are correct but IMO it is still legal.
I think "Route" header should be canonical hostname and not the SIP domain:
In "SIP Forum"'s SIPconnect program to get SIP compliant devices and services we can read:
"SIP Proxy Servers MUST use canonical hostnames in any 'Via:' and/or 'Route:' SIP header field that it inserts in the SIP message.":
http://www.zoomerang.com/web/SharedResults/SharedResultsSurveyResultsPage.as... (step 15)
So if that is true then OpenSer behaviour is correct and there is a bug in oSIP stack because it shouldn't add a "Route" header with SIP domain value in REGISTER messages. Could anyone confirm this in order to report the bug to oSIP developers?