El Thursday 11 October 2007 18:05:12 Alan Crosswell escribió:
We are running pua_bla in production with Polycom phones. BLA and BLF are basically the same term. The protocol used is based on a draft RFC (draft-anil-sipping-bla which is now in the BLISS IETF group).
Hum, how can be both BLA and BLF basically the same?
In BLA is needed a subscriber-phone sending a REGISTER with "To:other-user", a SUBSCRIBE from "other-user" and from "subscriber-phone"... while in BLF is just needed a SUBSCRIBE "To: other-user" with "Event: dialog".
Have you debugged what kind of REGISTER's and SUBSCRIBER's send you Polycom with your pua_bla module?
Thanks for any explanation. Regards.