[Kamailio-Users] INVITE branch handling for multiple contacts.

Greetings, Is there a place somewhere that expounds upon or otherwise illustrates the inner workings of call forking for multiple concurrent contacts? I can only find a patchwork of hints by perusing the documentation for the 'tm' and 'registrar' modules, and they don't provide me entirely with the understanding that I am looking for. Failing that, I am seeking answers and clarifications to the following general questions. All of them concern handling of an INVITE in a situation where the registrar module allows multiple concurrent contacts, and multiple contacts are in fact registered, and the "append_branches" modparam to "registrar" is set to 1. 1. What is officially supposed to happen if multiple contacts to which the INVITE is relayed all answer the call instantaneously, whether via 183 early media or 200 OK -- but not OOB ringing events? What I get seems a little strange, although perhaps there is an explanation that I am missing. Both far-endpoints send a 200 OK w/SDP and I hear both media streams simultaneously when I call, interleaved by clicks. After a while, the second (most recent) contact's media stream drops off because the UAC decides that the call has timed out because it has not received ACK replies to its 200 OKs; at the same time, OpenSER appears to generate a CANCEL for that second call leg. The CANCEL is replied to with a 200 OK (not a 487 Request Terminated?) although this seems a little bizarre since the dialog's state is already established -- but since the 200 OKs are never replied to, I suppose it is not necessary to receive a BYE in order to terminate that request. Meanwhile, 200 OKs in response to INVITE keep coming from the contact that was slower to pick up and was CANCEL'd (why? this is Asterisk 1.4), but the ACKs from them keep being routed to the first contact (the one that remains), which must be understandably confused as to why they're there although processed as retransmissions. I have a packet capture I'd love to send someone for interpretation, but would rather do it privately off-list. 2. Is there a shared REPLY-ROUTE for replies on each branch? Or is there a way to fragment particular reply routes for each branch? The goal I am ultimately looking to achieve is surely commonplace enough; I would like multiple concurrent registrants to be able to be rung at one request URI. But at present, it seems some very strange things are happening when this occurs that confuse the far-end UACs. That's what governs my intuition that I just need to properly understand how branching is supposed to work. Thanks, -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599