Hello,
--- Marian Dumitru marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro wrote:
If you try your approach, it will be a discrepancy between what SER and the phones think the expire value is. SER will consider the one received in the original req. (it will ignore the new value forced from script via append_hf() ) and the client will consider the value received in reply ( the one forced from script via append_to_reply() ).
Thanks!
Yes. You are correct. RFC says that the registrar should honour the expires parameter/header in the REGISTER request. It can add an expires header if it is not present in the request. Our softphones dont send expires parameter in the requests, may be the reason why there are no issues.
Best regards, Marian
Best Regards,
===== Girish Gopinath gr_sh2003@yahoo.com
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com