Hello,
On 25.03.19 22:56, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello,
I am currently debugging a strange issue related to the usage of uac_replace_from/to() after msg_apply_changes(). It works all fine, but in a Re-INVITE case it inserts the wrong headers for the 100 - Trying case. The calle
did you mean caller or callee? What side is sending the re-INVITE with the troubles?
Is uac using the record-route param to store the info about From/To? Or is via dialog variables?
Cheers, Daniel
side gets then a reply with wrong From/To. This happens all the time with this particular cfg.
I already checked for the usual issues:
- msg_apply_changes() called several times
- msg_apply_changes() called after transactions created/async processing etc..
Any ideas what else could be the problem?
The msg_apply_changes() is needed for some SDP filtering logic in the cfg.
Thanks and regards,
Henning