25 Mar
2019
25 Mar
'19
9:27 p.m.
Hello,
On 25.03.19 22:56, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello,
I am currently debugging a strange issue related to the usage of
uac_replace_from/to() after msg_apply_changes(). It works all fine, but in a
Re-INVITE case it inserts the wrong headers for the 100 - Trying case. The
calle
did you mean caller or callee? What side is sending the re-INVITE with
the troubles?
Is uac using the record-route param to store the info about From/To? Or
is via dialog variables?
Cheers,
Daniel
side gets then a reply with wrong From/To. This
happens all the time
with this particular cfg.
I already checked for the usual issues:
- msg_apply_changes() called several times
- msg_apply_changes() called after transactions created/async processing etc..
Any ideas what else could be the problem?
The msg_apply_changes() is needed for some SDP filtering logic in the cfg.
Thanks and regards,
Henning
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com
Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC, USA -- www.asipto.com