10 Feb
2010
10 Feb
'10
3:10 a.m.
Am 10.02.2010 02:15, schrieb Vikram Ragukumar:
Iñaki,
Thank you for your response.
This would indicate a SIP ALG.
Klaus
You could be behind a fu***** SIP-ALG enabled
router rewritting SIP
requests "to fix the NAT".
To detect if you router has SIP-ALG enabled you can try various options:
1) Ensure you are not using STUN in your client so the request
arriving to the proxy should contain client private address in Via and
Contact header.
I have checked the Via and Contact headers and they do contain the
client private address. I am using an SMC7004VWBR wireless router thats
about 8 years old. I have checked all the router settings and do not see
any option to enable/disable SIP ALG, so i presume the router is not
capable of rewriting SIP headers.
I will try your program out as another method of confirmation of the
router's SIP ALG capability.
I have found that this anomaly (extra byte in Contact-Length
header)occurs only while sending to the proxy on a specific port(5060).
By changing the port on which the proxy listens(7160), the
Contact-length header field is ok. Is there a list of routers out there that we know for
sure that are not
SIP ALG capable ?
Once again, thanks for you suggestions.
Regards,
Vikram.
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users