31 Oct
2005
31 Oct
'05
6:04 p.m.
Bogdan, can you give us more details of your plans?
We have to decide how to deal with the problem of killing a call in
progress and detect an hunged-up call.
I'd like to avoid the use of a B2BUA, so I'd like to know if, when and
how you plan to obtain this. I really cannot understand how you will
achieve this simply with a SER module. You need some way to store all
the data of dialogs in progress... Don't you?
Thanks.
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Greg,
keeping the call control on your hands is an vital need...With the
tomorrow release I prepared the first steps for a light dialog support
based on Routing mechanism - complete FROM changing and restoring for
the whole dialog was the prove of concept :).
By being able to control the call from somewhere in the middle, I target
especially issue no 2 and why not 4 and 5.
....and all this by avoiding the B2BUA.......
regards,
bogdan
Greg Fausak wrote:
> ya, that's been my experience too.
> it's a bit embarrassing to send your customer a bill
> for 18000 minutes on a single call...even if the gw operator
> doesn't bill you, you bill your customer, right?
>
> i am very interested in a b2bua project. they
> just come in handy for all sort of stuff.
>
> it is overkill for just terminating calls. they have other
> benefits as well...
>
> 1) homogenize the packets you see
> 2) obscure your network/customers to gateways
> obscure gateways to your customers
> 3) reduce packet size
> 4) provide a handy spot to kill a call in progress
> 5) and my favorite, hung call detection
>
> unfortunately, none of these benefits is large enough to
> convince some people that a b2bua is needed.
>
> -g
--
___________________________________________________
__
|- giannici(a)neomedia.it
|ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it
___________________________________________________