29 Sep
2014
29 Sep
'14
1:33 a.m.
Hi Carlos,
Any updates on this?
Kelvin Chua
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Kelvin Chua <kelchy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
i am not sure if this is related but, there are cases
when if a user adds
credit, it does not reflect on cnxcc.active_clients
after the next call. somehow, cnxcc saves the old credit and does not update
it
Kelvin Chua
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz
<carlos.ruizdiaz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Kelvin,
this is an interesting scenario. I will have to reproduce it myself in
order to reply you properly.
Answering your question, yes, it should be updated to 200. Let me check
ASAP.
Regards,
Carlos
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Kelvin Chua <kelchy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
hi carlos,
i have a serial forking scenario to several providers as failover. and i
used cnxcc_set_max_credit to control the session credit/time.
just wanted to make sure it does what i think it should do so i made a
little experiment.
the logic goes this way.
1. cnxcc_set_max_credit -> $100, cost per second -> $1
2. call will fail, try the next provider
3. cnxcc_set_max_credit -> $200, cost per second -> $2
what i am expecting to see is, if i do
kamctl kamcmd cnxcc.active_clients
i would see $200 as the max_amount. but in kamailio 4.1.5, i still see
$100, should it
be updated to $200? is there an override in cnxcc_set_max_credit when
called twice or after failure_route?
Kelvin Chua
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Carlos
http://caruizdiaz.com
http://ngvoice.com
+52 55 3048 3303
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users