7 Aug
2006
7 Aug
'06
8:43 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
try to use acc_db_request() instead of db_missed_flag
for failed
transactions. Maybe a look into the code would reveal how the callbacks
for accounting are executed and so see if resetting the missed flag in
failure route will prevent logging the 404.
By resetting the flag in the reply route the acc record can be
suppressed, but it would be an ugly hack to check in the reply route if
there will be serial forking in the failure route.
On the other hand, acc_db_request() doesn't log the response code if
called in the failure route, so it seems to become be a hack anyway.
Thanks,
Andy