RE: [Serusers] SER+Asterisk on high loads

In this case Asterisk will be bottle neck of whole system.. 50-100 calls because of g729 But why do you need SER in this case? that gonna be extremely unscallable system (not because of SER but because of asterisk). You can use simple asterisk to get same functionality. In my system, SER is registrar and NAT traversal (you need it to do SIP-SIP calls). Then I have b2bua to do CDR and digit manipulation and then it goes to termination carrier Asterisk as b2bua is kind of expensive in my opinion. Not so stable and take a lot of resources. Whenever I send call thru Asterisk I notice that overall quality go down. May be it just because I do not like asterisk :) If you in your setup will do same as in mine but instead of B2BUA use Asterisk, then it will be scalable quite nice by just increasing amount of asterisk servers -----Original Message----- From: Mik Cheez [mailto:michael_bulk@wildgate.com] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 11:55 AM To: Vitaly Nikolaev; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER+Asterisk on high loads How about the following scenario: One box acting as a proxy to a PSTN. Asterisk is handed the initial request (port 5060) in order to do some modifying of the packet (callID), and to keep a stateful connection for CDR's. Asterisk passes it to SER (port 5061 on the same box) which uses its logic to route the call to one of several PSTN's. All of this is done in g729. Why do it this way? SER cannot modify the callID without having issues. I don't trust SER to do the CDR, and logging on the endpoint is very difficult compared to Asterisk. Any idea what the load maximum would be with that same P4 3.X/Xeon? Best regards Vitaly Nikolaev wrote: clients. can