11 Jun
2008
11 Jun
'08
7:39 p.m.
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Robert Dyck writes:
Do I have this right? Loose_route return FALSE if there is no Route header or
if the Route header was a preloaded route, otherwise it returns 1. If it
returns 1 we know the request contained a Route header and any remaining
first route will not match the proxy. We do not know if whether the first
route was removed or it did not match. If it returns FALSE we do not know if
it ever had a Route header.
Are there any situations where we would not
remove the first route URI
if it matches the proxy? The RFC suggests to me that it is
unconditional.
yes, i want to remove first route uri if is matches the proxy itself.
if it doesn't, i want to do something else. if proxy removes
automatically the first uri for itself, how do i know that it was
removed?