Noel,
Thanks for taking the time to document your setup in such detail!
In general, the Vias and record-routes must be fixed. The rr parameter
enable_double_rr should be 1 (default). AFAIK, mhome=1 should handle the
vias. This thread may give some more background:
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2003-April/000003.html
Have you tried using record_route_preset on outgoing (if I understand you
setup?) to add the correct (public) address?
Also, unless mhome is on, the source address of the incoming packet will be
used when sending out. This will be detected as a martian by the linux
kernel (see /var/log/messages). mhome will use the correct source address
and fix the vias.
Anyway, if your fix works, you should be fine, but remember that if you
change your setup later (or add a new GW, new UAs...), you may run into
problems as you are not following the RFC.
g-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel Sharpe" <noels(a)radnetwork.co.uk>
To: "Greger V. Teigre" <greger(a)teigre.com>
Cc: "'SER Users'" <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Too Many Hops
Greger
I am trying to get a cascading hierarchy of geographically separated SIP
servers. The reason for this is that I am providing services to a wireless
community that connect to the internet via many different gateways to the
internet. Most of the users are behind a nat device, and connect to a SER
proxy on the wireless net work on the 10.0.0.0/8 network. Each SER server
keeps a local location database, but forwards any requests that it cannot
complete to a sip proxy on the internet (to which each SER proxy
replicates all REGISTER's). It looks a bit like this:
UAC(192.168.0.123)--->WIFI_AP(10.1.2.3)---->WIFI_GATEWAY_1--->INTERNET for
browsing / email / ftp etc
|
|
v
SER_SERVER on WiFi network
(10.0.0.123) also has (public IP Address)--->INTERNET GATEWAY for VOIP
1--->SER_SERVER on internet
^
|
UAC(192.168.0.234)--->WIFI_AP(10.3.4.5)---->WIFI_GATEWAY_2--->INTERNET for
browsing / email / ftp etc |
| |
| |
v |
SER_SERVER on WiFi network
(10.3.4.123) |
also has (public IP
Address)--->INTERNET GATEWAY for VOIP 2-----
Each SER server implements it's own far end nat traversal based on
nathelper/rtpproxy, which means that expensive internet links are not used
to terminate calls between subscribers on the same wifi network.
The issue I was having with loose routing appeared to be because the
SER_SERVER on the WiFi network was multihomed. When a reply cam back from
the ser server on the internet (I think it was only ACK's causing the
problem), SER tried to loose_route the reply and the next hop was infact
the servers own internal ip address.
After loosing much hair, I worked out that if I included the condition I
could get the packet to route through to the correct final destination. I
am not sure if it's because there is a REAL issue with loose_route not
working with mhomed properly, or if it's a peculiarity of my setup.
Noel
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
Noel,
It would be interesting to get a description of the setup that caused
this problem. Was that Asterisk as well? Same setup as Giovanni?
Dependent on auth/non-auth and how Asterisk has been set up with SER, we
have seen different problems with signalling and proxying of RTP. I know
there was an lr vs. lr=on issue a while back, but somewhere we don't have
RFC compliant behavior (all messages with routes should be loose routed).
g-)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel Sharpe"
<noels(a)radnetwork.co.uk>
To: "Giovanni Balasso" <giaso(a)yahoo.it>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Too Many Hops
sounds to me like you have a looping problem in
your script. I had
something similar when using the example from
OnSIP.org. The
loose_route bit needed to be inside a condition:
if (uri!=myself){
if (loose_route()) {
route(1); }; };
xlog/ngrep is your friend here as you will be able to see which message
is being sent between the two servers.
Noel
Giovanni Balasso wrote:
Alle 09:47, mercoledì 02 novembre 2005, Matteo
Piazza ha scritto:
> I have Ser and asterisk on the same machine.
> When i try to call with a SIP phone registred on asterisk another sip
> phone also registred on asterisk through SER I receve this error
> message:
> Too many hops
>
Too many hops is usually reached when there is no rule (or no way) to
deliver sip message, adding some log(), or better xlog(), to your
routing script could help you (and us) debugging and understanding
what's wrong, and which method(s) fail.
> if (method == "INVITE") {
> if (uri =~"^sip:0[0-9]*@*"){
> log(1, "Check 1 succed Forwarding to Asterisk\n");
> rewritehostport("192.168.9.97:5061");
> t_relay();
> break;
> };
> };
>
>
I don't think this will solve your problem but in my experience I had
better result with t_relay_to_udp("192.168.9.97","5061") than
rewritehostport("192.168.9.97:5061").
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers