30 Mar
2007
30 Mar
'07
9:44 a.m.
At 14:44 30/03/2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
jiri,
that is incorrect information - there was no plan / need / acceptance for the port you are
mentioning.
ok, I think that's a kind of pity, since this addresses some of the problems in
question.
I was hoepful we would have the capacity to port, but momentarily I'm not so
optimistic
about our cycles.
I thing you realize that the TM+timer code from SER and
OpenSER is following different direction of development, which makes quite unrealistic
your sayings.
I would say difficult, but not unrealistic. In any case, this has been exactly my
concern.
-jiri
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/