30 Mar
2007
30 Mar
'07
10:47 a.m.
At 14:54 30/03/2007, Jerome Martin wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:44 +0300, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
wrote:
Well actually the previous statement got me more confused. I don't see the real
point in forking to a different direction off the robustness features. Following
different direction is not apparently something what happens on its own, it
is something some must be striving for and I clearly don't see the point in it.
-jiri
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
jiri,
that is incorrect information - there was no plan / need / acceptance
for the port you are mentioning.
I thing you realize that the TM+timer code from SER and OpenSER is
following different direction of development, which makes quite
unrealistic your sayings.
HA ! I understand better now, I almost got confused
:-)
