27 Aug
2010
27 Aug
'10
4:19 p.m.
This whole 3.X migration is starting to sound quite appealing!
But back to solving the immediate issue: You say I would have to have
the from_uri defined for each rule. What about the ones that are
current null, would they be included in any from_uri definition?
Meaning that after trying with the rule where the from_uri matches, it
would fail-over to where the from_uri is null? (maybe I should stop
asking questions and do the test!)
//Anders
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Anders writes:
Talking about ugly solutions - maybe this could
work: The from_uri in
lcr always shows the domain name I have given to my customers - to
where they send calls. So I could create a new domain name (pointing
to the same IP), and then ask the customer to send to this domain -
and then in lcr I would put the new domain in the from_uri, and make
prefix with no failover for that domain. So there would be a
`fail-over-free` solution if calls are sent to a specific domain.
Would that work?
it would, but only if you would have from pattern defined for each
rule.
3.x also allows to you define lcr instances, which are totally
independent from each other. you could assign an lcr instance to the
request based on from which customer the request comes from.
-- juha