Re: [SR-Users] async_workers vs. async workers modparam in case of async_route()

Hello, On 21/11/16 06:41, Alex Balashov wrote: the workers param for async module was added with the first implementation of the module, as a proof of how to do async ops in kamailio.cfg besides the t_suspend()/t_continue(). As there were more components getting to do async ops, I added async_workers in the core so a common pool of extra processes is created and can be shared by many modules. At this moment, from what I remember by heart, mysql module and async (when using async_task_route()) use async_workers from the core. I don't recall exactly, but somehow I planned to switch async module to use only processes from the core, but I thought that it can break existing configs. To answer further, you don't need to keep them in sycn and you don't need core async workers if you use only async_route() (or async_sleep(), but this one has some traps highlighted in the readme, so I try not to promote it that much). Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com