Hello,
I expect it has to do with the special requirements on handling uri enforced by 'user=phone'. Something related was on sr-dev few time ago:
- http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2013-December/022267.html - http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2013-December/022269.html
At that time I checked the sources and parameters are linked to another field in uri structure than without it, thus the params field is somehow left empty. I had no time to investigate more the specs, maybe looking at parse_uri() will shed more light.
Cheers, Daniel
On 19/12/13 06:19, Juha Heinanen wrote:
i started to wonder, why my config does not work when there is ';user=phone' param in r-uri. in order to investigate, i added these to the config:
xlog("L_INFO", "r-uri = '$ru'\n"); xlog("L_INFO", "r-uri params = '$(ru{uri.params})'\n"); xlog("L_INFO", "r-uri params = '$sel(ruri.params)'\n");and made two tests. in the first, r-uri param is ;user=phone:
Dec 19 07:08:10 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[5107]: INFO: r-uri = 'sip:+35862345670@test.tutpro.com;user=phone' Dec 19 07:08:10 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[5107]: INFO: r-uri params = '' Dec 19 07:08:10 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[5107]: INFO: r-uri params = '<null>'
and in the second r-uri param is ;param=value:
Dec 19 07:09:59 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[5107]: INFO: r-uri = 'sip:+35862345670@test.tutpro.com;param=value' Dec 19 07:09:59 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[5107]: INFO: r-uri params = 'param=value' Dec 19 07:09:59 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[5107]: INFO: r-uri params = 'param=value'
note the difference. in the first, neither uri transformation nor ruri select works, but they work in the second.
i checked from rfc3261 and both request uris are syntactically valid and in both cases there is a valid r-uri parameter.
my current hack is to use tobody.params, but would like to get rid of it.
-- juha
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users