15 Sep
2014
15 Sep
'14
2:03 a.m.
What happens if you call t_relay() after setting $du?
Cheers,
Federico
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Nicholas Gill <nick(a)etellicom.com> wrote:
On 14/09/14 20:00,
sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org wrote:
In your script snippets it seems
that upon receiving the 302, in the failure route you set the $du and then
you pass the message to a RELAY route, which I suppose sends the 407
reply.
This seems to be the case, yes. The 407 comes from kamailio on the already
authenticated call. I presume this is done to trigger the caller to send
another INVITE.
If you don't need for special reasons that
the user performs a proxy
authentication, in the failure route you could just relay the INVITE to
the
target FreeSWITCH after setting $du to the value of your custom header.
This is exactly what I'm hoping to do, but I'm not sure of the correct
configuration to achieve this.
It was my intention to relay the INVITE to the target server by setting
the $du and then trigger the RELAY route. I have also tried setting $du and
then calling t_relay() directly, but I suspect I'm missing something minor
but important.
Cheers,
-nick
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users