17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
10:38 p.m.
I suppose it is a bug in your config file in that you try to
apply sl_send_reply to an ACK, whhich really does not make
much sense. If you record-route properly, ACK should be processed
by record-routing parts of script.
-jiri
At 05:36 AM 12/17/2003, Madan wrote:
Hi,
I have been facing a strange problem of ACK Failed.
I m using SER with SJ Phone and Xlite as softphone to make calls..but after say 10-15 mins
I m getting ACK Timedout! message on SJPhone..is this SIP UA bug or something to do with
SER or config?
regards,
Madan
get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <28684> <ACK>
0(8193) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
0(8193) DEBUG: add_param: tag=2124396779
0(8193) end of header reached, state=29
0(8193) parse_headers: flags=256
0(8193) check_self - checking if host==us: 14==14 && [202.71.135.212] ==
[202.71.135.219]
0(8193) check_self: host != me
0(8193) check_self - checking if host==us: 14==14 && [202.71.135.219] ==
[202.71.135.219]
0(8193) ral(): Topmost route URI: 'sip:1111@202.71.135.219;ftag=2124396779;lr=on'
is me
0(8193) parse_headers: flags=256
0(8193) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
0(8193) found end of header
0(8193) fnr(): No next Route HF found
0(8193) ral(): No next URI found
0(8193) lookup(): '' Not found in usrloc
0(8193) Warning: sl_send_reply: I won't send a reply for ACK!!
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/