Hello,
On Friday 02 January 2004 14:46, Franz Edler wrote:
from various examples in the SER admin_guide and my
own SIP knowledge-base
I conclude, that the action "loose-route()" is responsible for correct
routing of those requests, that are not destined to the proxy (host of
Request-URI is not the proxy) and that have a proper Route-header
indicating
"loose-routing".
As such the action "loose_route()" should be sufficient to modify the
Request in such a way, that the following action "t-relay()" finishes
processing of the request. Therefore the action short sequence
... if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; };
does all, what is necessary for loose routing of those requests.
My problem is, that I could not produce a condition, where "loose_route()"
evaluates to true, so that the action block { t_relay(); break; } is
executed. I expect, that in a simple call-scenario with one record-routing
SIP proxy (SER) the routing of the ACK- and the BYE-method should trigger
the above mentioned "loose_route()" action. But unfortunately it does not.
Why?
Because you made the wrong assumption: loose_route() will directly
deliver/forward the request if it contains a valid route header. If i'm not
wrong the t_relay() in the if clause is only for the case loose_route fails
e.g. because of a broken route header.
Greets
Nils