[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio not receiving packets on high CPS

Playing devil's advocate here: Aren't DB queries generally over TCP? Of course one should OPTIMIZE their DB queries, but in many cases they're necessary in many cases, right? Kaufman Senior Voice Engineer E: bkaufman(a)bcmone.com SIP.US Client Support: 800.566.9810 | SIPTRUNK Client Support: 800.250.6510 | Flowroute Client Support: 855.356.9768 [img]<https://www.sip.us/> [img]<https://www.siptrunk.com/> [img]<https://www.flowroute.com/> ________________________________ From: Olle E. Johansson via sr-users &lt;sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 11:09 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List &lt;sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; Cc: Alexis Fidalgo &lt;alzrck(a)gmail.com&gt;om>; Olle E. Johansson &lt;oej(a)edvina.net&gt; Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Kamailio not receiving packets on high CPS CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Well, you can set up a cluster of background workers and use the normal http_client. That will speed up the process to read from the network as the network client processes are freed up by you suspending the transaction and continuing in a background process (which you need many of). This will make life better in some cases, but not all. But in high volume, I would not _depend_ on any TCP-based external process, regardless if it’s HTTP or databases. /O __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!