[SR-Users] Wrong onreply_route is called after serial forking

Hello, i noticed thet in serial forking, replies to earlier branches arriving after sending out a new branch use the onreply_route of the later branch instead of the onreply_route set before sending the earlier branch.... How to reproduce: 1) set onreply_route to A 2) relay 1st branch 3) 1st branch times out, internal 408 is created 4) tm send CANCEL to 1st branch 5) in failure route, onreply_route is set to B 6) relay 2nd branch 7) 1st branch responds with 487, and goes into reply_route B instead of A I think each branch should take the reply_route which was set before it got relayed and not pick up later changes meant for other branches. How would i fix this? -- Greetings, Alex Hermann