Hi Alex,
have a look to the FAQ link I quoted earlier, they give some examples there.
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt –
https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services –
https://gilawa.com
-----Original Message-----
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 1:27 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] SEMS license with kamailio and rtpengine
On Feb 9, 2022, at 7:02 AM, Henning Westerholt
<hw(a)gilawa.com> wrote:
Generally speaking - if you combine "closely" GPL v2 and proprietary code, the
result needs to be also GPLv2. So, your example would not work from a licence point of
view for proprietary licensing.
Well, that’s just it; what’s the standard of “closely” being appealed to here, in
technical terms?
I assume the licence leaves it sufficiently vague that any given case would need to be
judicially tested, but perhaps there is ample prior experience with architectures
substantially similar to Kamailio?
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/,
http://www.csrpswitch.com/
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
*
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users