RE: [Serusers] problem with LCR and CANCEL

Hi Ben. You shouldn't use next_gw() in failure route if you receive Busy or Cancel from user:

failure_route[1] {

if (t_check_status("486")) { # Busy Here xlog("L_INFO", "time [%Tf] FAILURE ROUTE - 486 BUSY HERE\n"); t_relay(); break; }; if (t_check_status("487")) { # Request Terminated by CANCEL from Calling Party xlog("L_INFO", "time [%Tf] FAILURE ROUTE - 487 CANCEL BY CALLING PARTY\n"); break; }; if (!next_gw()) { t_reply("503", "Service not available - No more Gateways"); break; } else { t_relay(); }; }

Regards. MaV.-

-----Mensaje original----- De: Ben Smithurst [SMTP:ben@gradwell.net] Enviado el: Jueves, 01 de Septiembre de 2005 11:20 a.m. Para: serusers@lists.iptel.org Asunto: [Serusers] problem with LCR and CANCEL

hello,

apologies if this is a silly question...

Basically when using the LCR module, if I CANCEL the call before the remote party picks up, the LCR system will place the call again through the next gateway. I have found quite a few references to this in this list archives etc, so it is probably something fairly simple I have setup wrong, but none of the messages I found seemed to solve the problem for me. :-(

After some googling I have read that this is because the first gateway is not responding with a 487 (which it is in my case). My config has, among other bits,

route {

......

t_on_failure("1"); if (!next_gw()) { sl_send_reply("500", "cannot use next gateway"); break; };

..... }

failure_route[1] {

    t_on_failure("1");
    if (!next_gw()) {
t_reply("503", "No more gateways");
            break;
    };

    t_relay();

}

If required I can provide more details but is there anything obviously missing from the config above which I should be using?

thanks -ben

--

Ben Smithurst ben@gradwell.net gradwell dot com Ltd Systems Developer http://bensmithurst.com/ http://www.gradwell.com/

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers