Re: [SR-Users] RTPPROXY timeout patch.

Carsten, Here it goes: [root@devel rtpproxy-carsten]# ./rtpproxy -T 10 -f -F -i -l 192.168.200.90 -s udp:*:7722 -d DBUG ERR INFO -n tcp:127.0.0.1:7723 INFO:main: rtpproxy started, pid 22495 rtpproxy: >>> Running Timeout-Process DBUG:handle_command: received command "22428_8 Uc0,8,101 080b5d23d1603667 192.168.200.114 6380 0073852a;1" INFO:handle_command: new session 080b5d23d1603667, tag 0073852a;1 requested, type strong INFO:handle_command: new session on a port 48662 created, tag 0073852a;1 INFO:handle_command: pre-filling caller's address with 192.168.200.114:6380 DBUG:doreply: sending reply "22428_8 48662 192.168.200.90" DBUG:handle_command: received command "22436_8 Lc0,8,101 080b5d23d1603667 192.168.200.149 7614 0073852a;1 c758967a;1 xmlrpc:http://127.0.0.1:8000/RPC2" INFO:handle_command: lookup on ports 48662/58604, session timer restarted INFO:handle_command: setting custom timeout handler (xmlrpc:http://127.0.0.1:8000/RPC2) INFO:handle_command: pre-filling callee's address with 192.168.200.149:7614 DBUG:doreply: sending reply "22436_8 58604 192.168.200.90" INFO:process_rtp: session timeout INFO:remove_session: RTP stats: 982 in from callee, 4 in from caller, 986 relayed, 0 dropped INFO:remove_session: RTCP stats: 5 in from callee, 1 in from caller, 6 relayed, 0 dropped INFO:remove_session: session on ports 48662/58604 is cleaned up ERR:do_timeout_notification: Timeout socket is: èîÈÄÐÊ@ÍÈÄÈÄ`ê DBUG:reconnect_timeout_handler: reconnecting timeout socket ERR:reconnect_timeout_handler: can't create timeout socket: Address family not supported by protocol ERR:do_timeout_notification: unable to send timeout notification Very weird chars in the debug of what Timeout socket is... But the custom timeout handler are being printed correctly from the config file. INFO:handle_command: setting custom timeout handler (xmlrpc:http://127.0.0.1:8000/RPC2) Here I am running CentOS 5.2 32-bit. Thanks, Alexandre -----Mensagem original----- De: kaiserbock2(a)googlemail.com [mailto:kaiserbock2@googlemail.com] Em nome de Carsten Bock Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de março de 2011 14:18 Para: Alexandre Abreu Cc: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Assunto: Re: RTPPROXY timeout patch. Hi Alexandre, My version of RTP-Proxy is following: bock@bock-tde:~/ims/rtpproxy$ ./rtpproxy -v Basic version: 20040107 Extension 20050322: Support for multiple RTP streams and MOH Extension 20060704: Support for extra parameter in the V command Extension 20071116: Support for RTP re-packetization Extension 20071218: Support for forking (copying) RTP stream Extension 20080403: Support for RTP statistics querying Extension 20081102: Support for setting codecs in the update/lookup command Extension 20081224: Support for session timeout notifications Extension 20090810: Support for automatic bridging Extension 20100819: Support for timeout notifications using XML-RPC towards Kamailio/sip-router.org Please find attached a modified rtpp_notify.c file. I have just added some tiny debug output in order to see some points. Now you should see the following Debug-Outputs: rtpproxy: >>> Running Timeout-Process Then the notifier process is running. That would be good. If not, that's the reason why it is not working. When the request comes in, you should see the following: INFO:handle_command: setting custom timeout handler (xmlrpc:http://localhost:8000/RPC2) Then the Timeout-Socket was properly set, that would be good as well. Now the timeout: INFO:process_rtp: session timeout [...] ERR:do_timeout_notification: Timeout socket is: xmlrpc:http://localhost:8000/RPC2 That would be great, because then the Timeout towards the Kamailio should be triggerd. If these parts are ok, then there must be some issue either in the XML-RPC client library or in the communication between the RTP-Proxy and Kamailio. I hope you did a trace on the XML-RPC Port both on the RTPproxy and on the Kamailio? What distro are you using? My tests were only on Ubuntu and Debian, which are quite similar. Hope we find this issue, Kind regards, Carsten P.S.: I think i removed that check for the port for testing, that's why my version accepted the socket without port... (now i'm using "-n tcp:127.0.0.1:9999") 2011/3/16 Alexandre Abreu <alexandre.abreu(a)redt.com.br>br>: requested, 192.168.200.114:6380 192.168.200.149:7386 -- Carsten Bock http://www.ng-voice.com mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com