On Thursday 26 February 2004 15:59, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
As currently the rtp-proxy has to run on the same host as SER it does not make much sence IMHO to think about taking over rtp-proxy sessions. Then you would need some kind of rtp-proxy session replication, which should be easy when the nathelper module and the rtp proxy ever uses IP protocol for communication. But all this will only work if the backup server takes over the IP of the failed server, and you are not using SRV backup servers for example (except that a SRV backup can obviously also can takeover the IP).
Is it yet possible to build redundancy on top of SRV? I tested some clients (Xlite, Budgetone-100, Windows Messenger 4.7) wether they use SRV records to locate the proxy and Messenger is the only one who uses it.
I never claimed that SRV failover will work with all clients :-) But from the RFC clients are broken which do not support SRV and failover :-) But for sure i'm aware that can not simply throw away such clients, even if i would like to do so.
NO