28 Apr
2016
28 Apr
'16
1:51 a.m.
Hello,
can you make the full ngrep trace for the call (from initial invite sent
by kamailio, with all following sip messages) and send it over here?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/04/16 17:16, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
Hello Daniel
I did some more tests and my previous statement is wrong.
Actually it do call set_contact_alias on 200 reply for INVITEs
but somehow it has no change.
I really missing something here.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:35 PM, huseyin kalyoncu <hkalyoncu(a)gmail.com
<mailto:hkalyoncu@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Daniel
You are right. 200OK messages are also with private IPs.
I think the problem is that
since I call dlg_bridge with Kamailio's own IP
It sends INVITE messages to itself first then it routes INVITE msg
to user location.
Because of this i see two record routes in the INTIVE headers and
200 reply headers.
if (is_reply()) {
if(isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) {
if(is_first_hop())
set_contact_alias();
}
}
But according to this code in NATMANAGE block, it only set contact
if it is first hope.
Since these messages have two record routes, this code block does
not modify contact field
Am I right? or Am I missing something else?
Thanks
Huseyin
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
dlg_bridge is not using the location table at all, because it
has to use the contact from 200ok of INVITE.
Have you used set_contact_alias() for natted 200ok received
for INVITE?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/04/16 11:15, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Hello Daniel
This is the sample output from our location table;
kamailio=# select username,contact,received,user_agent from
location where username='5678*0012';
username | contact | received
| user_agent
-----------+---------------------------------+-----------------------+---------------------
5678*0012 | sip:5678*0012@192.168.1.21:5090
<http://0012@192.168.1.21:5090> |
sip:DEVICE_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090 | Cisco/SPA504G-7.6.1
(1 row)
After calling dlg_bridge Kamailio firing INVITE and rings the
device.
After answering on this device Kamailio firing REFER message.
But as you can see from ngrep output below, Kamailio is
trying to send this message to address in the contact field
which is a private IP.
U 2016/04/27 10:58:25.745935 KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090 ->
192.168.1.21:5090 <http://192.168.1.21:5090>
REFER sip:5678*0012@192.168.1.21:5090
<http://0012@192.168.1.21:5090> SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5090;branch=z9hG4bK0ab8.1c5e622e4af6b7b6c9ede7ade4a50bf8.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK0ab8.c8a54413000000000000000000000000.0.
To:
<sip:5678*0012@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS>;tag=199aaa02310a0799i1.
From:
<sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS>;tag=0d71401ca91009b00be5953e2813d7e4-7471.
CSeq: 11 REFER.
Call-ID: 63dc8c8a5ea88a30-868@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Max-Forwards: 69.
Content-Length: 0.
User-Agent: Kamailio.
Referred-By: sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Refer-To: sip:5678*0002@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS.
Contact: <sip:click2call@KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_ADDRESS:5060>.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
can you send the ngrep trace for such case? I would like
to look at the headers to understand properly what do you
mean.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26/04/16 15:23, huseyin kalyoncu wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users Hello
I am trying to implement click 2 call functionality on
Kamailio with dlg_bridge.
But It seems that Kamailio routes REFER messages to
devices according to Contact field of location table
instead of Received field.
But if the the IP in the Contact field is private REFER
messages are failing so
does the dlg_bridge.
I called dlg_bridge in the config like this:
dlg_bridge("sip:$param1", "sip:$param2",
"sip:IP_ADDRESS_OF_KAMAILIO:5060");
It rings the device in $param1 but after answering on
that device
Kamailio fails to send REFER if the Contact field for
that device is Private IP.
So it fails to initiate a call.
How can I force Kamailio to use Received field for REFER
messages instead of Contact field?
Thanks
Huseyin
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
<http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users