Re: [Users] privacy=full and contact hf

Hi Wolfgang, if the destination is a GW and you set a RPID hdr, you do not need to remove the contact and FROM - the GW will silently ignore them. regards, Bogdan Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote: >Really sure that there is no way only using openser? I don't want to >deploy that fat beast additionally just for a single feature. > >Or is there something I haven't considered yet? > > >Thanks, >Wolfgang > > > > >Klaus Darilion wrote: > > > > >>If you need full privacy, then it is better to use a B2BUA like >>Asterisk. >> >>regards >>klaus >> >>Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Hi, >>> >>> >>>before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag >>>"privacy=full" >>>in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to >>>make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from >>>the >>>SIP requests. >>> >>>I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>From hf and the Contact hf. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something >>>anonymous. >>> >>>The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from. >>> >>>But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, >>>required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to >>>send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would >>>have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once again >>>will be rewritten to target for the meant destination. >>> >>>Is there a best practice for this item? >>> >>> >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Wolfgang >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Users mailing list >>>Users(a)openser.org >>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > >_______________________________________________ >Users mailing list >Users(a)openser.org >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > >