13 May
2008
13 May
'08
11:31 a.m.
Hi Allan,
the presence server is called 'unstable' because it was not tested much.
I tested it with EyeBeam and some other clients very long time ago and it seemed
to be working that time, but I haven't tested it so much to be able to say that
it is really stable. And I'm afraid a bit of changes in core since that time.
I don't know much about OpenSER presence so I can speak only for SER. SER's
presence modules implementation is done according drafts before RFCs were
released so it can differ a bit from RFC specification. But I hope not too much
because that were some later draft versions (mentioned somewhere in docs).
with regards,
Vaclav
On Po, kvě 12, 2008 at 12:01:38 +0800, Allan Chao ( 趙廷睿 ) wrote:
Dear All:
I want to use SER's Presence module to do presence server , but someone say it's
not stable , so ,
1. Does anyone could tell me why it doesn't stable ? because it looks work after
i do some testing with eyebeam.
2. how does openser's presence ? is it better than SER's presence ?
thanks,
allan
DISCLAIMER:
Sample Disclaimer added in a VBScript.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers